Gen. James Cartwright

The Department of Defense’s deputy chief management office (DCMO) has just released a Request for Information (RFI) that reminded me of an Breaking Gov story I did about 4 months ago, in which now-retired Gen. James Cartwright and Deputy Chief Management Officer Beth McGrath said semantic interoperability will drive DoD’s information environment.

I was asked how this RFI, which deals with the semantic web, can help DOD in particular and perhaps the federal government on a broader scale because I have worked on semantic interoperability for the government for the past 10 years and on a DOD Enterprise Information Web the past 6 months. Keep reading →

Marine Corps Gen. James E. Cartwright has a long history of commandeering technology before it was ready for the military.

So few were surprised, including Deputy Secretary of Defense Bill Lynn, when Cartwright–better known in defense circles as Hoss Cartwright–was soon brandishing a specially-secured iPad capable of accessing classified military information otherwise off limits to iPad devices. Keep reading →

A long-standing reliance on proprietary technology solutions and antiquated acquisition rules have left the Defense Department “pretty much in the stone age as far as IT is concerned,” the nation’s second highest ranking military officer said today.

Marine Gen. James Cartwright, outgoing vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs, said speeding up acquisition cycles is essential if the America is to maintain its military advantage. Keep reading →

COMMENTARY:
Many cybersecurity professionals and military strategists have anxiously awaited the public version of the Department of Defense’s Cyber Operations Strategy and on July 14 the wait ended when DoD released the 13 page document.

The document follows much of what has been talked about or insinuated in discussions that have taken place in the not so distant past. It breaks down the strategy into five distinct stratagems and initiatives that frame DoD’s operational intent. Keep reading →

I am attending the 3rd Annual DoD SOA & Semantic Technology Symposium. This year the focus is on the necessity of semantic technology to achieve interoperable business operations through shared understanding. The theme is how semantic interoperability will drive DoD to a more efficient and effective information environment.

DoD Deputy Chief Management Officer Beth McGrath welcomed about 300 attendees yesterday and referred to her April 4th memorandum that said: DoD historically spends more than $6.0B annually developing and maintaining a portfolio of more than 2,000 business systems and Web services. Many of these systems, and the underlying processes they support, are poorly integrated. It is imperative, especially in today’s limited budget environment, to optimize our business processes and the systems that support them to reduce our annual business systems spending. She said: “It is all about all of the data and how to work with it”.

During his afternoon keynote, I had the opportunity to ask General James Cartwright, Vice Chairman of the Joint Chief of Staff and our nation’s second highest ranking military officer, what the goal of that memo reduction was: say reduce the cost and number of systems by 50%? General Cartwright responded by saying the goal was to drive the cost down significantly and get more agile results. He also said that the military’s highest priority was to get programmers and social scientists “deployed to the edge” to met the needs of our warfighters.

A recurring question has been: show me the analytic for any claim about a more efficient and effective DoD information environment. So I decided to first check the Federal IT Spending Dashboard that I had reproduced to see what the DoD situation was. More on that in my next report.

This article appears courtesy of Breaking Defense.

America does not need a stealthy long-range bomber able to penetrate deep into remote, well-defended places, America’s No. 2 military officer said this morning. The country, Marine Gen. James “Hoss” Cartwright said, cannot afford to buy an upgraded nuclear triad of new bombers, new intercontinental ballistic missiles and new nuclear missile submarines. Keep reading →